Copying this to digimaus...

I've sent you some micronet netmail and a fidonet zone 1 netmail. Did you
see any of those? I know my micronet and fidonet netmail is working, though rick's routing may not work for net 618...

--
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp,
,wss) (Ports 22,23,110,21,119,8080) (ssh login 'bbs' pass 'shsbbs').


*** THE READER V4.50 [freeware]
---
* Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (618:300/50)

Hello Shurato!

16 Aug 24 16:11, you wrote to me:

I've sent you some micronet netmail and a fidonet zone 1 netmail. Did
you see any of those? I know my micronet and fidonet netmail is
working, though rick's routing may not work for net 618...

I've not received any netmail from you at all. Both networks are working here for netmail. You might want to ask Rick to make sure his netmail routing works but the way the network is set up, there shouldn't be a problem.

Also, instead of routing me netmail, you can crash me directly at either 618:618/1 and 1:80/200 via BinkP. That's actually the preferred way to sen netmail as routed netmail is a kludge.

-- Sean

... "A man is never too old to learn." - Thomas Middleton
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240309
* Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)

Hello Sean!

17 Aug 24 00:23, you wrote to Shurato:

I've sent you some micronet netmail and a fidonet zone 1 netmail.
Did you see any of those? I know my micronet and fidonet netmail
is working, though rick's routing may not work for net 618...

I've not received any netmail from you at all. Both networks are
working here for netmail. You might want to ask Rick to make sure his netmail routing works but the way the network is set up, there
shouldn't be a problem.

Also, instead of routing me netmail, you can crash me directly at
either
618:618/1 and 1:80/200 via BinkP. That's actually the preferred way

I personally recommend 1:18/200 for FidoNet; it's actually in the nodelist. ;-)

to sen netmail as routed netmail is a kludge.

Routed netmail was originally intended to save sysops money back when most mail was transmitted via modem over phone lines. These days, most systems are available over the internet 24 hours a day, so crashing netmail makes much more sense. If you send directly to the destination, you don't need to worry about your message ending up in a black hole somewhere, due to someone's misconfigured mail processor.

That being said, we should work with Rick to make sure that routed netmail to his net/region actually arrives at its destination.

Andrew

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (618:100/2)

Hello Shurato!

16 Aug 24 16:11, you wrote to me:

I've sent you some micronet netmail and a fidonet zone 1 netmail.

Did

you see any of those? I know my micronet and fidonet netmail is working, though rick's routing may not work for net 618...

I've not received any netmail from you at all. Both networks are working here for netmail. You might want to ask Rick to make sure his
netmail routing works but the way the network is set up, there
shouldn't be a problem.

Also, instead of routing me netmail, you can crash me directly at either 618:618/1 and 1:80/200 via BinkP. That's actually the preferred way to sen netmail as routed netmail is a kludge.

I'd sent to 1:18/200 but just sent to 1:80/200. I don't have the means to crash netmail as I don't know how to process nodelists with my binkp client/server setup (IREX).

--
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp,
,wss) (Ports 22,23,110,21,119,8080) (ssh login 'bbs' pass 'shsbbs').


*** THE READER V4.50 [freeware]
---
* Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (618:300/50)

Hello Andrew,

17 Aug 24 00:55, you wrote to Sean Dennis:

to sen netmail as routed netmail is a kludge.

Routed netmail was originally intended to save sysops money back when
most mail was transmitted via modem over phone lines. These days,
most systems are available over the internet 24 hours a day, so
crashing netmail makes much
more sense. If you send directly to the destination, you don't need
to worry about your message ending up in a black hole somewhere, due
to someone's misconfigured mail processor.

useless fact but my experience with routed (fidonet) netmail is pretty good. and it makes the nostalgia factor ++++ :)

Regards,
--
dp

telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-

... Uptime: 90d 11h 25m 17s (?! or 40d 18h 10m 53s)
--- GoldED/2 1.1.4.7+EMX
* Origin: Roon's BBS - Budapest, HUNGARY (618:520/10)

Daniel Path wrote to Andrew Leary <=-

useless fact but my experience with routed (fidonet) netmail is pretty good. and it makes the nostalgia factor ++++ :)

Micronet supports routed netmail but there is a caveat that other systems
may strip attachents as the mail goes through the system. So I amways recommend crashmail.

My system accepts crashed netmail from any system. It's better as a ZC and
a software author. LOL

-- Sean


--- MultiMail/Linux
* Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)